Growth. The China Way.

China: taking the long view

30/09/2021
China taking a long view

Summary

China’s regulatory crackdown on “big tech” does not alter its strategic goals. It will continue opening up and global investors will likely keep increasing their China allocations. What long-term lessons can investors take away from this period?

Key takeaways

  • China’s recent regulatory actions have unsettled some international investors, but we do not believe this correction is a game-changer
  • China still needs foreign capital to fuel its industrial growth, so its domestic capital markets seem set to become more important than ever
  • In the face of negative news, global investors have continued to snap up China A-shares – suggesting a “buy the dip” mentality
  • hina’s capital markets bring different risks and greater unpredictability, but investors have historically been rewarded with long-term outperformance

When China passed a strict data privacy law in August 2021, it was just the latest sign of an intensifying crackdown on “big tech”. Before this effort to address social concerns such as safe-guarding citizens’ data privacy, the government made many other market-moving proclamations. In fact, since November 2020, when the Ant Group IPO was pulled just before listing, the government has made approximately 50 announcements that impacted the share prices of China’s offshore companies listed in New York, many of them the big internet and ecommerce companies.

While unsettling for international investors, we do not believe this correction is a game-changer that means investors should reconsider their view of China. The recent regulatory blitz is a reaction to emerging social problems like the low birth rate and social inequality, the growing influence of big tech during the pandemic, and ongoing tensions with the US. But in our view, it does not lessen the country’s commitment to opening up to the foreign investment that will be critical to its growth ambitions.

Big tech in China: from hero to zero

The Chinese government’s overriding policy goals – stated in its 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) – remain to foster high-quality growth, innovate in science and technology, and uplift its citizens’ livelihoods. What’s changed is that rather than viewing the internet and other new economy sectors as national champions of innovation, policymakers increasingly view big tech as a source of social problems, and the root of many financial and security risks.

To judge what’s likely to happen from here, it’s best to view the situation through the lens of the Chinese government:

  • Policymakers want to encourage capital markets to invest less in consumer internet services and more into high-tech manufacturing. This reflects an ongoing policy focus on self-sufficiency, industrial upgrades and carbon neutrality.
  • More broadly, China is engaged in an ongoing effort to reduce reliance on Western economies, especially the United States. It is no coincidence that resources are being poured into research and development across areas including artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductors, robotics, energy storage, gene sequencing and blockchain.

But China still needs foreign capital to fuel its industrial growth. So although access to capital through US listings seems likely to stop – at least for future listings – the domestic capital markets are set to become more important than ever. This indicates that the government will want to reduce volatility in local equity and bond markets, which leads us to expect that the tone and intensity of the regulatory intervention will soften.

The US and EU were already focused on regulating big tech

Investors may also find some reassurance in the fact that China is not the first country to try to rein in big tech. Regulators in the US and EU were already focused on tech giants’ size, alleged anti-competitive practices, control of consumer data and so on. The big difference is that China’s political and governance system allows it to act faster.

In fact, to some extent, Chinese regulators were behind the curve before the crackdown started with the suspension of Ant’s IPO. Ant’s fintech model, for example, was regulated in an extremely light-touch way in comparison to the traditional banking system. China’s recent changes, therefore, are partly about catching up.

Unlike the West, however, China frames its tech crackdown as an effort to preserve financial and social stability. The official slogan – “prevent the disorderly expansion of capital” – was first used in December 2020 and has become a key policy priority. The government is concerned about tech companies growing so influential that they distort market outcomes. Officials are also worried about the wealth and power accumulated by the billionaire founders of these tech firms.

Beyond big tech, China is focused on addressing social issues

China has also been taking action to address social problems at home – as have policymakers in the US and EU. But China’s recent efforts to reform its education sector have been quite forceful, given the extent of the social issues China is trying to address:

  • For years, China’s education system has been almost entirely dependent on the results of standardised tests, creating a culture of almost endless homework and test preparation in schools – including widespread use of paid tutoring outside school to achieve an edge.
  • China has also been turning out legions of students capable of rote memorisation, rather than the creative minds needed to achieve global leadership.
  • This has made it harder for children of poorer families to compete academically with richer ones, contributing to longer-term problems with economic inequality.

With so many social issues at stake, the writing was on the wall in March 2021 when President Xi Jinping called the tutoring sector “a chronic disease that is very difficult to cure”. As such, it wasn’t a total surprise to see the government crack down on after-school education companies. But we do not see this as part of a broader attack on the private sector or on capitalism, per se. Rather, it comes in the context of education being seen as a public good given China’s social challenges. So although class is over for many of China’s tutoring firms, and there is still potential for reforms in other sectors, these seem unlikely to challenge the viability of whole business models.

US-China tensions are having little impact on China’s domestic capital markets

Despite the fact that regulators in the US and China are addressing some similar problems, the countries still have major differences. In fact, poor US-China relations are bringing US capital raisings to an end. The Chinese government has announced that it will review the use of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) structures, which Chinese companies commonly use to raise money from foreign investors. We believe that China will block VIE listings in the US, but we think it’s unlikely that they would be outlawed for existing companies. Further, it’s probable that VIE listings will continue in Hong Kong H-shares, given China’s need for foreign capital to meet its strategic objectives.

Despite the negative news flow, global investors have continued to add to China A-shares (see Exhibit 1 on next page). In July, foreign investors bought a net USD 1.6 billion of China A-shares through the Stock Connect scheme. At the time of writing, flows into China A-shares were also positive in August 2021. This is the ninth consecutive month of positive flows, as buyers raise their structural asset allocation to China. Although down on previous months, it suggests a “buy the dip” mentality.

What’s more, the currency and fixed-income markets have been stable in contrast to other periods of uncertainty. The renminbi and domestic bond markets have even trended higher at certain points.

Reflecting that the focus of the government’s new regulations is quite narrow, there has been a contrast between the stability of China A-shares and sharp falls of offshore companies listed in Hong Kong and the US – typically internet, ecommerce and education stocks. Notably, the MSCI China is down about 14% year to date, through the end of August 2021. However, the onshore A-shares market is up slightly, returning around 1% during the same time period. This indicates that the volatility has been largely confined to big tech and education.

Exhibit-1-buyer-of-china-a-shares

Looking forward, we believe that the domestic A-share market stands to benefit from the challenges facing the offshore market, especially Chinese companies listed in the US. It will be an even more important source of funding for the country’s long-term economic development, and will become more diverse, with greater liquidity. Indeed, it was noticeable how state-owned media recently posted supportive comments about mainland equities after bouts of weakness in A-shares.

Our perspective: investors should take the long view on China

Looking to the longer term, we do not believe that the current crackdown will lead to a structural de-rating of Chinese equities due to a rising risk premium. The internet sector is a big part of offshore equities, so weakness in this sector will inevitably have some impact on the overall market valuation. But the domestic A-shares market has continued to be resilient – as shown by the strong foreign investor flows previously discussed.

In our view, international investors should continue to consider increasing their structural allocation to Chinese equities. We also suggest viewing China as a standalone allocation, rather than part of an existing emerging markets investment. Look at it this way: the Chinese economy accounts for 16% of global GDP and its domestic A-share market represents more than a fifth of global equities trading. By contrast, the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) gives only a 5% weighting to China. That’s a big gap to close.Furthermore, many companies in the regulators’ sights are large corporations with significant, profitable businesses, and they are likely to continue to grow successfully over the longer term.

In the assets we manage on behalf of our clients, our approach to China has largely remained unchanged throughout this volatility. In fact, we have taken the opportunity of market weakness to initiate several new positions. Yet key themes in our portfolios remain in line with where we see sustained growth potential and continued government policy backing. This includes sectors linked to China’s need for self-sufficiency (semiconductors), industrial upgrades (robotics) and lower carbon emissions (renewable energy and electric vehicle supply chains).

Overall, our perspective is that investing in China brings different risks and greater unpredictability compared with Western markets, but investors have historically been rewarded with long-term outperformance. Indeed, as Exhibit 2 shows, a 20-year investment in China equities to the end of August would have generated a 402% return, against 267% for global equities. In the past, moments of volatility like this have proved to be buying opportunities.

Exhibit-2-volatility

 

> download

MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) is an unmanaged index designed to represent performanc e of large- and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed and 24 emerging markets. MSCI China Index is an unmanaged index that captures large- and mid-cap representation across approximately 85% of the China equity universe. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.

7 reasons to stay invested in China equities

30/09/2021
7 reasons to stay invested in China equities

Summary

Although recent news out of China has understandably unsettled the markets, we don’t think it changes the long-term investment case. Volatility goes hand in hand with China’s higher long-term return potential. Understanding the dynamics at play can help make these changes easier to take in stride.

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors
  • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”)

    • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”) as an umbrella fund under the UCITS regulations has within it different sub-funds investing in fixed income securities, equities, and derivative instruments, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • All sub-funds (“Sub-Funds”) may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV. 

    • Some Sub-Funds as part of their investments may invest in any one or a combination of the instruments such as fixed income securities, emerging market securities, and/or mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, property-backed securities (especially REITs) and/or structured products and/or FDI, exposing to various potential risks (including leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market, fluctuations in the value of and the rental income received in respect of the underlying property, and over the counter transaction risks). 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in single countries or industry sectors (in particular small/mid cap companies) which may reduce risk diversification. Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, country and region, emerging market (such as Mainland China), creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, asset allocation, interest rate, volatility and liquidity, counterparty, sovereign debt, valuation, credit rating agency, company-specific, currency  (in particular RMB), RMB debt securities and Mainland China tax risks. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in convertible bonds, high-yield, non-investment grade investments and unrated securities that may subject to higher risks (include volatility, loss of principal and interest, creditworthiness and downgrading, default, interest rate, general market and liquidity risks) and therefore may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Funds. Convertibles will be exposed prepayment risk, equity movement and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest a significant portion of the assets in interest-bearing securities issued or guaranteed by a non-investment grade sovereign issuer (e.g. Philippines) and is subject to higher risks of liquidity, credit, concentration and default of the sovereign issuer as well as greater volatility and higher risk profile that may result in significant losses to the investors. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in European countries. The economic and financial difficulties in Europe may get worse and adversely affect the Sub-Funds (such as increased volatility, liquidity and currency risks associated with investments in Europe).

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in the China A-Shares market, China B-Shares market and/or debt securities directly  via the Stock Connect or the China Interbank Bond Market or Bond Connect and or other foreign access regimes and/or other permitted means and/or indirectly through all eligible instruments the qualified foreign institutional investor program regime and thus is subject to the associated risks (including quota limitations, change in rule and regulations, repatriation of the Fund’s monies, trade restrictions, clearing and settlement, China market volatility and uncertainty, China market volatility and uncertainty, potential clearing and/or settlement difficulties and, change in economic, social and political policy in the PRC and taxation Mainland China tax risks).  Investing in RMB share classes is also exposed to RMB currency risks and adverse impact on the share classes due to currency depreciation.

    • Some Sub-Funds may adopt the following strategies, Sustainable and Responsible Investment Strategy, SDG-Aligned Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Relative), Green Bond Strategy, Multi Asset Sustainable Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute Threshold), Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Score Strategy, and Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute). The Sub-Funds may be exposed to sustainable investment risks relating to the strategies (such as foregoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, selling securities when it might be disadvantageous to do so, and/or relying on information and data from third party ESG research data providers and internal analyses which may be subjective, incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable and/or reducing risk diversifications compared to broadly based funds) which may result in the Sub-Fund being more volatile and have adverse impact on the performance of the Sub-Fund and consequently adversely affect an investor’s investment in the Sub-Fund. Also, some Sub-Funds may be particularly focusing on the GHG efficiency of the investee companies rather than their financial performance which may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in share class with fixed distribution percentage (Class AMf). Investors should note that fixed distribution percentage is not guaranteed. The share class is not an alternative to fixed interest paying investment. The percentage of distributions paid by these share classes is unrelated to expected or past income or returns of these share classes or the Sub-Funds. Distribution will continue even the Sub-Fund has negative returns and may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Fund.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s capital or effectively out of the Sub-Fund’s capital which represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per share and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the respective Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi/AQ Dis (Annually/Monthly/Quarterly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.


    Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust constituted under the laws of Hong Kong pursuant to the Trust Deed. Allianz Thematic Income and Allianz Selection Income and Growth and Allianz Yield Plus Fund are the sub-funds of the Trust (each a “Sub-Fund”) investing in fixed income securities, equities and derivative instrument, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, company-specific, emerging market, creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, volatility and liquidity, valuation, sovereign debt, thematic concentration, thematic-based investment strategy, counterparty, interest rate changes, country and region, asset allocation risks and currency (such as exchange controls, in particular RMB), and the adverse impact on RMB share classes due to currency depreciation.  

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in other underlying collective schemes and exchange traded funds. Investing in exchange traded funds may expose to additional risks such as passive investment, tracking error, underlying index, trading and termination. While investing in other underlying collective schemes (“CIS”) may subject to the risks associated to such CIS. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in high-yield (non-investment grade and unrated) investments and/or convertible bonds which may subject to higher risks, such as volatility, creditworthiness, default, interest rate changes, general market and liquidity risks and therefore may  adversely impact the net asset value of the Fund. Convertibles may also expose to risks such as prepayment, equity movement, and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • All Sub-Funds may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks.  The use of derivatives may result in losses to the Sub-Funds which are greater than the amount originally invested. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • These investments may involve risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this website.

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s income and/or capital which in the latter case represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per distribution unit and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi Dis (Annually/Monthly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.