Embracing Disruption

Investing in China’s State Owned Enterprises: A Deep Dive

For many years, investing in China’s State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) has typically been viewed by international investors as, at best, a low-quality proxy for China’s economic growth. They have been synonymous with low profitability, questionable governance, and poor shareholder returns.

Summary

  • Despite some scepticism towards SOEs, a great deal of progress has been made.
  • Debt burdens have eased, stock incentive schemes for management and employees are more widespread, cash flows are improving, and there is a growing focus on share-holder returns through higher dividends and buybacks.
  • Tarring all SOEs with the same brush and assuming they add little economic value is, in our view, misguided. Selectivity remains essential.

The reality, however, is that, given the make-up of China’s economy and the composition of equity indices, an allocation to China equities will inevitably include meaningful investments in SOEs. And this is not necessarily a negative. Indeed, in the recent challenging equity market environment, SOEs as a whole have actually outperformed private enterprises quite convincingly.

In our view, there is a significant gap between the perception and reality of SOEs. In some areas – for example, China’s goal of carbon neutrality – SOEs are at the forefront of crucial change. In this article we seek to address key issues around investing in SOEs and why we believe they can offer a valuable opportunity set to investors.

SOEs as proportion of China’s equity market – reduced size, but still a big influence

Since economic reform and opening-up policies began in 1978, China’s SOEs have undergone a long process of gradual and progressive transformation. Today, SOEs are a slimmed down version of their former selves. For example, the number of central SOEs – that is, SOEs controlled by the central government – has shrunk by close to 20% (from 117 to 97) in the years from 2012-2023. There has also been significant M&A activity across the SOE landscape, with businesses looking to improve efficiency and resource allocation.

So while the overall number of listed SOEs has increased over the years, they have come to represent a smaller part of the overall universe, particularly as private sector investment opportunities have mushroomed (Chart 1). This change is also reflected in terms of market capitalization. Twenty years ago, when international investors were mainly restricted to offshore markets, SOEs accounted for over 90% of the MSCI China Index. In comparison, SOEs currently account for under 50% of the China A market (Chart 2).

Although their relative influence has decreased, SOEs are still an important part of China’s equity markets, as well as the country’s overall economic structure. Indeed, SOEs continue to dominate in sectors seen as strategically important, including energy, power utilities and financials (Chart 3). And since 2021, mainly as a result of relative share price outperformance, the SOE weight in China equity markets has increased.

Chart 1: Number of Listed Companies in onshore and offshore China equity markets since 1990
Chart 1: Number of Listed Companies in onshore and offshore China equity markets since 1990

Source: (left) Wind, Allianz Global Investors, as of 30 June 2024

Chart 2: SOE weight in onshore and offshore markets over time
Chart 2: SOE weight in onshore and offshore markets over time

Source: Wind, Bloomberg, Allianz Global Investors, as of 31 July 2024

Chart 3: MSCI China All Shares Index: SOE vs Non-SOE weight by sector
Chart 3: MSCI China All Shares Index: SOE vs Non-SOE weight by sector

Source: Wind, Allianz Global Investors, as of 31 July 2024

Chart 4: SOE debt to asset ratio over time
Chart 4: SOE debt to asset ratio over time

Source: Wind, National Bureau of Statistics of China, HSBC Equity Research, Allianz Global Investors, as of 31 July 2024

“SOE Reform”

It has long been recognized within China that SOEs require a significant overhaul if they are to be transformed into more competitive and modern enterprises. Indeed, SOE reform has taken place over several decades.. It has consistently been a core element in China’s economic planning process – with the goal of improving financial performance – but the thinking about how reforms should be implemented has evolved.

For example, in the last decade there has been a push for SOEs in strategically important industries (such as energy supply, transportation buildout, and semiconductors) to consolidate. While the results have been mixed, some of these cases have certainly resulted in improvements to capital allocation as consolidated Chinese SOEs put more focus on gaining market share on a global stage instead of competing against each other.

There has also been a significant improvement in the balance sheets of many SOEs, with a notable reduction in debt levels over the last decade in particular. This was partly helped by supply side reform, where the government applied a ceiling to the overall production capacity of certain upstream industries like materials. In addition, the recovery in some commodity prices has also helped boost margins.

From an investability perspective, some of the more relevant reforms have come about as a result of SOEs becoming more market-oriented in their resource allocations. This has typically been in areas such as consumer products and services, health care, and construction machinery. Successful SOEs in these areas often share some common traits with private enterprises: a workforce incentivized through employee stock ownership plans, professional managers with a strong industry background, the introduction of independent board members, well-established distribution networks, and recognized brand names developed over years.

It has also been encouraging to see a rising number of SOEs adopting employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), which help to better align management interest with that of minority shareholders. Properly designed and structured, these can be an important indicator of a positive corporate governance and business culture.

Chart 5: Number of China A-share companies with Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)
Chart 5: Number of China A-share companies with Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)

Source: Wind, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, as of 31 March 2024.

Recent government initiatives have included the use of financial targets for SOEs, such as return on equity and net profit growth. And in the last year, the government has taken an important additional step, selectively assessing SOE management based on market capitalization. Tying financial market indicators with performance evaluation for senior management in SOEs may, over the longer term, have a more significant impact for investors.

Dividend yields and share buybacks – a new trend

A notable recent development in China equity markets has been a marked increase in dividend payouts and share buybacks; and SOEs have been at the forefront of this.

This change was spurred by a regulatory push earlier in 2024. Enhancing shareholder returns has become a key focus of the State Council – effectively the national cabinet – as well as the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), in a move that echoes recent governance changes in Japan and Korea.

From a fundamental perspective there certainly appears to be room to increase dividends and share buybacks. Chinese companies in aggregate (ex-financials) have around USD 2.3 trillion of cash on their balance sheets, equivalent to around 27% of their prevailing market cap – a considerably higher level than in most other global markets. And cash flows are expected to improve, especially for larger companies in more mature sectors, as the structural economic slowdown feeds into reduced capex requirements.

Chart 6: Cash-to-Market Cap and Dividend Payout Ratios of China equities

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, as of 25 April 2024.

Chart 7: China A-Share SOEs share buybacks

Source: Wind, UBS China Equity Strategy, as of 31 December 2023.

In terms of dividends, China corporate payout ratios of around 30% are relatively low in both Asian and global contexts. And while the momentum for share buybacks has strengthened in Hong Kong-listed stocks in recent years, it is still at a relatively nascent stage in onshore markets. China A-Share companies bought back shares equivalent to only around 0.2% of free float market cap in 2023. As a point of reference, S&P 500 share buybacks have, on average, been 2.1% of listed market cap each year in the last decade.

With SOEs now more incentivized – and pressurized – to enhance shareholder returns, they have been at the forefront of these market developments. The dividend payouts of SOEs increased to CNY 1,237 billion in 2023, around 67% higher than 2019 as a pre-Covid comparison.

Total share buyback volumes by listed SOEs rose to CNY 33bn in 2023, close to a six-fold increase since 2019 (Chart 7).

A further development is the higher frequency of dividend payments. Bellwether stocks such as stateowned banks have historically only paid dividends once a year. In their latest quarterly reports the banks mapped out plans to also pay interim dividends in future. This should be an appealing feature, especially for domestic retail investors.

After a sustained period of listed SOEs underperforming non-SOEs, the last three years have seen a significant reversal (Chart 8). There are several explanations.

Chart 8: Calendar year returns of SOEs and non-SOEs
Chart 8: Calendar year returns of SOEs and non-SOEs

Source: Wind, Allianz Global Investors, as of 6 August 2024. The above calendar year return is derived based on changes in aggregate market cap of SOE vs non SOE companies in China A-shares universe.

A key factor has been the relatively strong performance of sectors which are dominated by SOEs. Over the last three years, energy, utilities, telecom, and financial stocks have led the way. This year, Chinese banks reached all-time share price highs. In contrast, other sectors which have been more vulnerable to reduced earnings in the weak macro environment have struggled.

As a reflection of the economic situation, domestic Chinese investors have also come to see SOEs as a defensive safe haven, given their more robust balance sheets, access to funding, and more resilient business models. With government bond yields declining significantly, higher dividend yield stocks – many of which are SOEs – has also been a key investment theme. And, conversely, there has been the impact of government policy on private enterprises in the internet, education, and property sectors, which has resulted in a significant share price reset amid the uncertainty.

A new focus on ESG & Sustainability

In our view, there has been a very evident shift in how many Chinese companies view their ESG and sustainability responsibilities. SOEs have been in the vanguard. Qualitatively we see this in the way companies have become more open to dialogue and, along with this, improving levels of information disclosure. Quantitatively, this can be measured by the increased number of companies providing ESG reports (Chart 9). An important catalyst has been regulatory pressure. For example, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) has announced a mandatory requirement of ESG full disclosure for central SOEs. This is happening alongside a step-up of ESG disclosure guidance by the mainland China stock exchanges.

The addition of financial market performance as part of the KPI’s of SOE management teams has also helped to improve the alignment of their interests with minority shareholders.

A good example is Kweichow Moutai, the largest constituent of the MSCI China A Onshore index. Moutai is a leading white liquor brand in China with a dominant and well-entrenched market share. It is also an SOE. Over time we have observed a distinct change in the corporate culture. Previously, Moutai provided extremely limited disclosures on their business activities and access to senior management was highly restricted, at best. They now proactively reach out to investors to discuss company proposals before voting, and publish an increasingly comprehensive ESG report that is even available in English.

Chart 9: Number of China A companies with ESG/CSR disclosure

Source: Wind, Allianz Global Investors, as of 31 December 2023.

Chart 10: Kweichow Moutai cash dividend history

Source: Wind, Allianz Global Investors, as of 31 December 2023.

Perhaps the biggest change, however, is their use of cash. Moutai was heavily scrutinized in previous years for its socalled “government donations”, a reference to payments made to its key local government shareholder but not to minorities. The dividend policy was radically revised in 2022; in parallel, the company committed to a dividend payout ratio of at least 75%.

So while SOEs may have a reputation for poor corporate governance, the reality is that third-party ESG scores for many SOEs have improved significantly, and in some sectors are close to or higher than non-SOE companies.

Chart 11: MSCI Governance Score by industry group in China
Chart 11: MSCI Governance Score by industry group in China

Source: MSCI, Allianz Global Investors, as of 3 September 2024.

Conclusion

Despite the skepticism towards SOEs, a lot of progress has been made over the years. Debt burdens have eased, stock incentive schemes for management and employees are more widespread, cash flows are improving and there is a growing focus on shareholder returns through higher dividends and share buybacks.

Of course, there is still a long way to go, and many SOEs continue to face challenges including low levels of efficiency and questionable governance. Nonetheless, tarring all SOEs with the same brush and assuming they add little economic value is, in our view, misguided.

While the SOE exposure in our portfolios has typically been lower than the benchmark (e.g. for our China A-Shares strategy: 40.6% versus 47.4%, as of 31. July 2024), SOEs have been some of the strongest contributors to relative performance in recent years. The key, in our view, is to understand the people behind the business, their aspirations and incentives, as well as their execution capability. This requires on-the-ground work to engage with management, cross checking along the supply chain, and using our Grassroots® Research network.

  • Disclaimer
    Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

    The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted. This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is for Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations and is for information purpose only. This document does not constitute a public offer by virtue of Act Number 26.831 of the Argentine Republic and General Resolution No. 622/2013 of the NSC. This communication’s sole purpose is to inform and does not under any circumstance constitute promotion or publicity of Allianz Global Investors products and/or services in Colombia or to Colombian residents pursuant to part 4 of Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication does not in any way aim to directly or indirectly initiate the purchase of a product or the provision of a service offered by Allianz Global Investors. Via reception of this document, each resident in Colombia acknowledges and accepts to have contacted Allianz Global Investors via their own initiative and that the communication under no circumstances does not arise from any promotional or marketing activities carried out by Allianz Global Investors. Colombian residents accept that accessing any type of social network page of Allianz Global Investors is done under their own responsibility and initiative and are aware that they may access specific information on the products and services of Allianz Global Investors. This communication is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced, except for the case of explicit permission by Allianz Global Investors. This communication does not constitute a public offer of securities in Colombia pursuant to the public offer regulation set forth in Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication and the information provided herein should not be considered a solicitation or an offer by Allianz Global Investors or its affiliates to provide any financial products in Brazil, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional /professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws.

    This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG; Allianz Global Investors UK Limited, authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in HK, by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore, by Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; in Japan, by Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424], Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association, the Investment Trust Association, Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; in Taiwan, by Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan; and in Indonesia, by PT. Allianz Global Investors Asset Management Indonesia licensed by Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).

    3952798

Recent insights

Navigating Rates

All eyes will be on the US elections in November – but the implications for markets could be quite different depending on who wins.

Discover more

Embracing Disruption

For many years, investing in China’s State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) has typically been viewed by international investors as, at best, a low-quality proxy for China’s economic growth. They have been synonymous with low profitability, questionable governance, and poor shareholder returns.

Discover more

Navigating Rates

Going into the year, 2024 was always set to be an intense election period, with polls in more than 60 countries. It turned out to be even more action-packed than anticipated, with snap elections in France and Japan giving investors even more to focus on, in addition to the US election. What are the implications of one of the busiest years in election history? We asked our global CIOs how investors could position themselves in a shifting political terrain.

Discover more

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors
  • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”)

    • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”) as an umbrella fund under the UCITS regulations has within it different sub-funds investing in fixed income securities, equities, and derivative instruments, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • All sub-funds (“Sub-Funds”) may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV. 

    • Some Sub-Funds as part of their investments may invest in any one or a combination of the instruments such as fixed income securities, emerging market securities, and/or mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, property-backed securities (especially REITs) and/or structured products and/or FDI, exposing to various potential risks (including leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market, fluctuations in the value of and the rental income received in respect of the underlying property, and over the counter transaction risks). 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in single countries or industry sectors (in particular small/mid cap companies) which may reduce risk diversification. Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, country and region, emerging market (such as Mainland China), creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, asset allocation, interest rate, volatility and liquidity, counterparty, sovereign debt, valuation, credit rating agency, company-specific, currency  (in particular RMB), RMB debt securities and Mainland China tax risks. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in convertible bonds, high-yield, non-investment grade investments and unrated securities that may subject to higher risks (include volatility, loss of principal and interest, creditworthiness and downgrading, default, interest rate, general market and liquidity risks) and therefore may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Funds. Convertibles will be exposed prepayment risk, equity movement and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest a significant portion of the assets in interest-bearing securities issued or guaranteed by a non-investment grade sovereign issuer (e.g. Philippines) and is subject to higher risks of liquidity, credit, concentration and default of the sovereign issuer as well as greater volatility and higher risk profile that may result in significant losses to the investors. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in European countries. The economic and financial difficulties in Europe may get worse and adversely affect the Sub-Funds (such as increased volatility, liquidity and currency risks associated with investments in Europe).

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in the China A-Shares market, China B-Shares market and/or debt securities directly  via the Stock Connect or the China Interbank Bond Market or Bond Connect and or other foreign access regimes and/or other permitted means and/or indirectly through all eligible instruments the qualified foreign institutional investor program regime and thus is subject to the associated risks (including quota limitations, change in rule and regulations, repatriation of the Fund’s monies, trade restrictions, clearing and settlement, China market volatility and uncertainty, China market volatility and uncertainty, potential clearing and/or settlement difficulties and, change in economic, social and political policy in the PRC and taxation Mainland China tax risks).  Investing in RMB share classes is also exposed to RMB currency risks and adverse impact on the share classes due to currency depreciation.

    • Some Sub-Funds may adopt the following strategies, Sustainable and Responsible Investment Strategy, SDG-Aligned Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Relative), Green Bond Strategy, Multi Asset Sustainable Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute Threshold), Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Score Strategy, and Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute). The Sub-Funds may be exposed to sustainable investment risks relating to the strategies (such as foregoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, selling securities when it might be disadvantageous to do so, and/or relying on information and data from third party ESG research data providers and internal analyses which may be subjective, incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable and/or reducing risk diversifications compared to broadly based funds) which may result in the Sub-Fund being more volatile and have adverse impact on the performance of the Sub-Fund and consequently adversely affect an investor’s investment in the Sub-Fund. Also, some Sub-Funds may be particularly focusing on the GHG efficiency of the investee companies rather than their financial performance which may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in share class with fixed distribution percentage (Class AMf). Investors should note that fixed distribution percentage is not guaranteed. The share class is not an alternative to fixed interest paying investment. The percentage of distributions paid by these share classes is unrelated to expected or past income or returns of these share classes or the Sub-Funds. Distribution will continue even the Sub-Fund has negative returns and may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Fund.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s capital or effectively out of the Sub-Fund’s capital which represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per share and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the respective Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi/AQ Dis (Annually/Monthly/Quarterly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.


    Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust constituted under the laws of Hong Kong pursuant to the Trust Deed. Allianz Thematic Income and Allianz Selection Income and Growth and Allianz Yield Plus Fund are the sub-funds of the Trust (each a “Sub-Fund”) investing in fixed income securities, equities and derivative instrument, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, company-specific, emerging market, creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, volatility and liquidity, valuation, sovereign debt, thematic concentration, thematic-based investment strategy, counterparty, interest rate changes, country and region, asset allocation risks and currency (such as exchange controls, in particular RMB), and the adverse impact on RMB share classes due to currency depreciation.  

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in other underlying collective schemes and exchange traded funds. Investing in exchange traded funds may expose to additional risks such as passive investment, tracking error, underlying index, trading and termination. While investing in other underlying collective schemes (“CIS”) may subject to the risks associated to such CIS. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in high-yield (non-investment grade and unrated) investments and/or convertible bonds which may subject to higher risks, such as volatility, creditworthiness, default, interest rate changes, general market and liquidity risks and therefore may  adversely impact the net asset value of the Fund. Convertibles may also expose to risks such as prepayment, equity movement, and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • All Sub-Funds may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks.  The use of derivatives may result in losses to the Sub-Funds which are greater than the amount originally invested. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • These investments may involve risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this website.

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s income and/or capital which in the latter case represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per distribution unit and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi Dis (Annually/Monthly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.