Career
Menu

Sustainability data: turning the tide

Thomas Roulland

A strong proprietary ESG1 data architecture is the cornerstone in understanding and aligning sustainable outcomes alongside financial returns. The challenge is to turn the mass of available sustainability data into insights that make an actionable difference.

Key takeaways
  • Integrating non-financial factors into investment decisions is increasingly mainstream, but the choice and style of integration is still evolving.
  • We think a dedicated ESG data strategy is critical for global asset managers to meet current and future data, portfolio scoping and reporting needs.
  • Our dedicated Sustainability Methodologies and Analytics team strategically addresses the challenges of data selection, aggregation and implementation across public and private asset classes.
  • Our new Sustainability Insights Engine – or SusIE – is a proprietary data tool to enhance understanding of ESG data.

Recent years have witnessed significant growth and change around the topic of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing within the asset management industry. Rising investor interest has combined with evolving regulatory perspectives on ESG integration and a forced rethink of sustainability investing in the wake of the pandemic and geopolitical shocks. But the industry has yet to address the best way to handle the availability and application of sustainability data.

Without a dedicated and thoughtful approach to ESG data management, we think asset managers risk being overwhelmed. At Allianz Global Investors, we have a team dedicated to guiding investors through the current deluge of sustainability data including scores, ratings, key performance indicators (KPIs) and controversies – now that effective ESG data management has become a strategic necessity.

Everything everywhere all at once

The growth in ESG disclosures in recent decades has been dramatic and now reached a point where most of the world’s largest companies report on sustainability (see Chart 1). This shift has been driven primarily by two factors: investor interest and regulation. 

Companies have been able to address investor interest in sustainability or corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting through frameworks provided by industry bodies like the Carbon Disclosure Project2 , the Global Reporting Initiative3 or the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board.4 These organisations have promoted and provided guidance on the most material ESG topics for public disclosure by corporations.

Exhibit 1: Global sustainability reporting rates, 1993-2022

Source: KPMG International5

The second and perhaps more visible driver has been the recent wave of regulatory initiatives hitting the capital markets. At continental and national levels, regulators have presented varying requirements for the disclosure of sustainability information from corporates. An example is the European Commission’s Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) framework, which requires specific indicators and methodologies to allow comparative analysis on potentially harmful investments.5 We anticipate this regulatory evolution to continue, especially outside Continental Europe.

We expect the company coverage and extent of ESG disclosures to expand significantly in the coming years. For example, climate reporting is expanding from Scope 1 and 2 emissions to a far wider scope of factors including Scope 37, methane, carbon offsets and even governance. The expanded disclosures will help on quantifying topics like net zero, taxonomy alignment and sustainable investment share8 . As more information is presented, all stakeholders will have to refine and adapt to ensure they are not paralysed by unhelpful analysis.

Too much of a good thing?

Investors are already struggling with the current scale of sustainability data, which is not necessarily helped by the multiplication of sources and methodologies – we expect both to escalate exponentially in the coming years. The main challenge derives from the population of data from ever-expanding and unregulated data providers that we estimate has exceeded a thousand now (see Chart 2). This translates into different standards on data capture, interpretation, methodology and delivery populating varying outputs for risk, sustainability, impact or controversy measures.

We are now able to measure our frustration at this complexity and lack of uniformity. While the correlations of outputs from the more mature financial credit ratings providers are at least 94%9, the ratings from the large ESG data providers exhibit lower and more disparate correlation – as highlighted by the CFA Institute in 2021 (see Chart 3).

Exhibit 2: Growth of ESG ratings and rankings providers

Source: Allianz Global Investors *projected figure

Exhibit 3: Correlation of ESG ratings (%)

Source: CFA Institute10

Meet SusIE – a dedicated sustainability data platform

While it took the finance industry several decades to come together on International Financial Reporting Standards, we are trying to achieve the same for nonfinancial standards in a fraction of the time. At AllianzGI, we believe sustainability requires a very specific and dedicated data approach to selection and aggregation.

As such, we put in place the Sustainability Methodologies and Analytics team in 2021 to develop a transparent, robust, and digital architecture. Now launched, this architecture is known as SusIE or our Sustainability Insights Engine.

SusIE will support the delivery of ESG, sustainability and impact data – with accompanying perspectives and opinions – to our investment professionals. It involves a robust approach to scoping data sources, efficient aggregation of this data, and the population of this data into clear and commercial front office-facing tools. SusIE is designed to support the introduction of new data, removal of redundant data, and alignment to new client product offerings. An example is the new net zero alignment toolkit, scheduled for launch later in 2023.

Exhibit 4: Example ESG profile from the AllianzGI SusIE showing Company A in the insurance sector

Image taken from SusIE dashboard showing ESG screening and controversy scores across several factors.

How we scope data for SusIE

We value the cognitive diversity of the different approaches in the market, and this helps us avoid unintended implicit biases in model outputs. But discipline is needed in how we treat the different sources, and we separate data providers into three broad categories11

  • Generalist – these provide a full range offering of ESG services, including raw data, peer analysis, ESG scores and qualitative analysis on ESG factors. 
  • Specialist – a highly granular, specific or niche offering of data, opinions (eg, small cap, private markets) or themes (eg, biodiversity, social impact).
  • Technology – providers using alternative data capture techniques like artificial intelligence or natural language processing to offer a new range of services and analytics. These can include forward-looking measures, fuller coverage of investable universes, news flow screens and truly independent raw data sets.

Positioned for an ESG technology-powered future

The one constant in any form of technology is change and we are readying ourselves for this. We currently identify three likely important elements of any evolution of data and how they can be embedded in a robust and resilient ESG data strategy:

  1. Evolving data capture away from current reliance on purchased data. New technologies will allow for more alternative and independent sources, capturing more perspectives. A likely future hybrid model will see quality raw data complemented by external expert opinions.
  2. Powerful engines and efficient data processing to address the volume of data. This includes cleansing, matching, computing, transforming and distributing separate sources into consistent, standardised data sets. More granular E, S and G metrics will inform investment decisions and asset allocation and meet client-reporting expectations.
  3. Risk assessments will benefit from new techniques. The scraping of formal reporting suites is now mainstream, but a fuller and more predictive understanding of material risks will be achieved through new technologies applied to an entity’s entire value chain. A fuller measure of idiosyncratic non-financial risks will allow for investment diversification of these risks.

Nothing artificial about the intelligence outlook

In summary, the realm of ESG data is expanding swiftly in volume and complexity. Investors will expect asset managers to guide them through the integration of ESG factors into investment decisions as well as the risk and opportunity sets – at the same time as meeting challenging regulatory and reporting demands. We embrace the opportunity afforded by the scale and complexity of the data topic to demystify and guide our clients through a likely eventful period of evolution in investment approaches. A strong proprietary ESG data architecture is the cornerstone in understanding and aligning nonfinancial outcomes alongside financial returns.

1 ESG = Environmental, Social and Governance
2 Carbon Disclosure Project – www.cdp.net/en
3 Global Reporting Initiative – www.globalreporting.org
4 Sustainability Accounting Standard Board – www.sasb.org
5 Source: KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022, KPMG International, September 2022. Worldwide sample of the top 5800 companies represent a worldwide sample of the top 100 companies by revenue in 58 countries or jurisdictions, 5800 companies in total. World’s 250 largest companies represent the world’s 250 largest companies by revenue based on the 2021 Fortune 500 ranking
6 Another example is the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU, as well as the proposed Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive.
7 Scope 1,2,3 are different categories of greenhouse gas emissions, Scope 3 emissions cover those produced by customers using the company’s products https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/scope-emissions-climate-greenhouse-business/
8 The share of a fund that is considered as sustainable according to the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations definition
9 Study on long-term debt ratings from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings of 400 companies in 24 industries, Kevin Prall, “ESG 7. Ratings: Navigating Through the Haze,” blog posting at CFA Institute, 10 August 2021
10 Study on ESG ratings of 400 companies in 24 industries, Kevin Prall, “ESG Ratings: Navigating Through the Haze,” blog posting at CFA Institute, 10 August 2021
11 In the future, we envisage a fourth category of uncontracted or non-formal data sources, such as public sources, NGOs, general or specialist press articles or industry bodies, which could help inform or complement data sets or scores.

  • Disclaimer
    Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

    The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.

    This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is for Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations and is for information purpose only. This document does not constitute a public offer by virtue of Act Number 26.831 of the Argentine Republic and General Resolution No. 622/2013 of the NSC. This communication’s sole purpose is to inform and does not under any circumstance constitute promotion or publicity of Allianz Global Investors products and/or services in Colombia or to Colombian residents pursuant to part 4 of Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication does not in any way aim to directly or indirectly initiate the purchase of a product or the provision of a service offered by Allianz Global Investors. Via reception of his document, each resident in Colombia acknowledges and accepts to have contacted Allianz Global Investors via their own initiative and that the communication under no circumstances does not arise from any promotional or marketing activities carried out by Allianz Global Investors. Colombian residents accept that accessing any type of social network page of Allianz Global Investors is done under their own responsibility and initiative and are aware that they may access specific information on the products and services of Allianz Global Investors. This communication is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced. This communication does not constitute a public offer of securities in Colombia pursuant to the public offer regulation set forth in Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication and the information provided herein should not be considered a solicitation or an offer by Allianz Global Investors or its affiliates to provide any financial products in Brazil, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional/professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws.

    This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies:

    Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG; in HK, by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore, by Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; in Japan, by Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424], Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association, the Investment Trust Association, Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; in Taiwan, by Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan; and in Indonesia, by PT. Allianz Global Investors Asset Management Indonesia licensed by Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).
    2779954

Recent insights

Navigating market concentration as sustainable investors

One of the defining features of equity markets over recent years has been extremely high levels of index concentration, with the so-called “Magnificent Seven” making up around a third of the total market capitalization of the S&P 500.

Discover more
by Giles Money , Alex Bibani
Close-up of a glowing semiconductor chip held by a robotic arm

Technology needs an ecosystem. That’s the opportunity

With megatrends like Artificial Intelligence and ‘digital Darwinism’ disrupting the business landscape, the Technology sector is poised to remain a key driver for equity markets and a crucial element in client portfolios in the decades to come.

Discover more

by Jeremy Gleeson

Outlook 2025: New ways to diversify

Outlook 2025: New ways to diversify

As the focus moves from the US election to tariffs and trade wars, a supportive yet volatile market environment encourages investors to explore more “medium risk” opportunities in fixed income or private markets.

DISCOVER NOW
by Stefan Hofrichter, CFA , Virginie Maisonneuve , Michael Krautzberger , Gregor Hirt , Deborah Zurkow | 7 days ago

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors

  • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”)

    • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”) as an umbrella fund under the UCITS regulations has within it different sub-funds investing in fixed income securities, equities, and derivative instruments, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • All sub-funds (“Sub-Funds”) may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV. 

    • Some Sub-Funds as part of their investments may invest in any one or a combination of the instruments such as fixed income securities, emerging market securities, and/or mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, property-backed securities (especially REITs) and/or structured products and/or FDI, exposing to various potential risks (including leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market, fluctuations in the value of and the rental income received in respect of the underlying property, and over the counter transaction risks). 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in single countries or industry sectors (in particular small/mid cap companies) which may reduce risk diversification. Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, country and region, emerging market (such as Mainland China), creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, asset allocation, interest rate, volatility and liquidity, counterparty, sovereign debt, valuation, credit rating agency, company-specific, currency  (in particular RMB), RMB debt securities and Mainland China tax risks. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in convertible bonds, high-yield, non-investment grade investments and unrated securities that may subject to higher risks (include volatility, loss of principal and interest, creditworthiness and downgrading, default, interest rate, general market and liquidity risks) and therefore may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Funds. Convertibles will be exposed prepayment risk, equity movement and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest a significant portion of the assets in interest-bearing securities issued or guaranteed by a non-investment grade sovereign issuer (e.g. Philippines) and is subject to higher risks of liquidity, credit, concentration and default of the sovereign issuer as well as greater volatility and higher risk profile that may result in significant losses to the investors. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in European countries. The economic and financial difficulties in Europe may get worse and adversely affect the Sub-Funds (such as increased volatility, liquidity and currency risks associated with investments in Europe).

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in the China A-Shares market, China B-Shares market and/or debt securities directly  via the Stock Connect or the China Interbank Bond Market or Bond Connect and or other foreign access regimes and/or other permitted means and/or indirectly through all eligible instruments the qualified foreign institutional investor program regime and thus is subject to the associated risks (including quota limitations, change in rule and regulations, repatriation of the Fund’s monies, trade restrictions, clearing and settlement, China market volatility and uncertainty, China market volatility and uncertainty, potential clearing and/or settlement difficulties and, change in economic, social and political policy in the PRC and taxation Mainland China tax risks).  Investing in RMB share classes is also exposed to RMB currency risks and adverse impact on the share classes due to currency depreciation.

    • Some Sub-Funds may adopt the following strategies, Sustainable and Responsible Investment Strategy, SDG-Aligned Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Relative), Green Bond Strategy, Multi Asset Sustainable Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute Threshold), Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Score Strategy, and Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute). The Sub-Funds may be exposed to sustainable investment risks relating to the strategies (such as foregoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, selling securities when it might be disadvantageous to do so, and/or relying on information and data from third party ESG research data providers and internal analyses which may be subjective, incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable and/or reducing risk diversifications compared to broadly based funds) which may result in the Sub-Fund being more volatile and have adverse impact on the performance of the Sub-Fund and consequently adversely affect an investor’s investment in the Sub-Fund. Also, some Sub-Funds may be particularly focusing on the GHG efficiency of the investee companies rather than their financial performance which may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in share class with fixed distribution percentage (Class AMf). Investors should note that fixed distribution percentage is not guaranteed. The share class is not an alternative to fixed interest paying investment. The percentage of distributions paid by these share classes is unrelated to expected or past income or returns of these share classes or the Sub-Funds. Distribution will continue even the Sub-Fund has negative returns and may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Fund.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s capital or effectively out of the Sub-Fund’s capital which represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per share and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the respective Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi/AQ Dis (Annually/Monthly/Quarterly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     


    Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust constituted under the laws of Hong Kong pursuant to the Trust Deed. Allianz Thematic Income and Allianz Selection Income and Growth and Allianz Yield Plus Fund are the sub-funds of the Trust (each a “Sub-Fund”) investing in fixed income securities, equities and derivative instrument, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, company-specific, emerging market, creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, volatility and liquidity, valuation, sovereign debt, thematic concentration, thematic-based investment strategy, counterparty, interest rate changes, country and region, asset allocation risks and currency (such as exchange controls, in particular RMB), and the adverse impact on RMB share classes due to currency depreciation.  

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in other underlying collective schemes and exchange traded funds. Investing in exchange traded funds may expose to additional risks such as passive investment, tracking error, underlying index, trading and termination. While investing in other underlying collective schemes (“CIS”) may subject to the risks associated to such CIS. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in high-yield (non-investment grade and unrated) investments and/or convertible bonds which may subject to higher risks, such as volatility, creditworthiness, default, interest rate changes, general market and liquidity risks and therefore may  adversely impact the net asset value of the Fund. Convertibles may also expose to risks such as prepayment, equity movement, and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • All Sub-Funds may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks.  The use of derivatives may result in losses to the Sub-Funds which are greater than the amount originally invested. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • These investments may involve risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this website.

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s income and/or capital which in the latter case represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per distribution unit and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi Dis (Annually/Monthly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.