What signs of a rebound should investors watch for?

20/04/2020
What signs of a rebound should investors watch for?

Summary

As the coronavirus crisis continues, we are seeing signals that this bear market has likely not reached its bottom. While investors should be cautious, they should also actively look for evidence that typically signals a rebound.

Key takeaways

  • Just as this has been a rapid sell-off by historical standards, the outlook could suddenly turn more positive – but we are likely not there yet
  • We built a watch list of what to look for when seeking the end of a bear market, and it proved useful in gauging the trough in equities in spring 2009. While history doesn’t repeat itself, it often rhymes
  • Massive fiscal and monetary stimulus are among the necessary conditions for the bear market to bottom out, but they are not sufficient. Other conditions, including a trough in cyclical dynamics and attractive valuations, must be in place as well
  • Recent volatility has created potential investment opportunities for active investors using a thorough bottom-up process in equities or bonds

The world is watching the overwhelming human toll the coronavirus is taking, and no one knows when this crisis – or in the impact on the financial markets – will end. Global stock prices have been exceptionally volatile in recent few months: the MSCI World Index reached an all-time high on 12 February, then fell more than a third when the coronavirus crisis hit, before rebounding by more than 15% in late March. Amid so much uncertainty, investors want to know: is it time to rebuild positions in risk assets or does the recent rally represent only a temporary recovery?

To see if the bear-market bottom may be near, use our watch list

One way to answer this question is to examine the end of previous major US equity bear markets. Inspired by Russell Napier’s “Anatomy of the Bear”, we previously built a “watch list” of criteria to look for, and it proved useful in gauging the trough in equities in spring 2009. While history doesn’t repeat itself, it often rhymes, so we think our watch list could be a helpful guide for investors.

It indicates that it is too early – at least at the time of writing – to call the end of the market sell-off even though there are also reasons to be positive about the market outlook. Here’s what we think investors should look for.

1. Major fiscal and monetary stimulus needs to take effect

Status: positive
Investors have cheered the various monetary and fiscal stimulus measures undertaken globally to mitigate the economic fall-out – notably in the US, where a record USD 2 trillion fiscal package was signed. While highly welcome and necessary, such measures have historically not been sufficient to turn around the outlook for equities during bear markets. For example, during the last financial crisis, numerous fiscal and monetary policy measures were enacted from summer 2007 onwards, yet equities did not rebound until March 2009. No stimulus can reasonably be expected to compensate for the shortfall in aggregate demand and disruptions to global supply chains during a crisis like this, and while liquidity injections and credit lines can buy time, they can’t solve the solvency problems of a highly leveraged private sector.

2. The triggering event must have passed

Status: negative
The current market sell-off was caused by a virus that continues to spread in Europe and in the US, and a vaccine will likely not come to the market before the end of this year at the earliest. The end of this external shock needs to be at least in sight before we can begin to be constructive on risk assets such as equities, and we don’t know long the current disruption will last.

3. Stocks can’t be overvalued

Status: fairly negative
Equity valuations are more reasonable today than they were in mid-February, but they are still high in the biggest equity market (the US). For instance, the S&P 500 is trading at a cyclically-adjusted price-earnings ratio (CAPE) – our preferred way of valuing equities – of around 23, which is just below the average of the last three decades. This compares to 30 a few weeks ago, but it is well above the 13 we saw in March 2009 – and other major US equity bear markets troughed at 10 or below. In Europe, valuations are on the cheap side but still around a quarter above the levels seen in 2009. Japanese and emerging-market equities, on the other hand, are trading at around 2009 levels and offer value for long-term investors.

4. Spreads must tighten

Status: neutral to negative
Fixed-income spreads have all widened substantially in recent months – in the corporate investment grade and high-yield segments, in emerging markets and in money markets – but they remain far below the 2009 levels. Admittedly, spreads in some segments have tightened a bit as of late. But historically, more broad-based spread tightening has on average occurred slightly after the equity bear market reached its trough. In a few instances, spreads turned down before equities started to rebound. As of today, fixed income spreads are still not flashing a green signal for equities.

5. The financial sector needs to stabilise

Status: neutral
The 2008-2009 crisis was triggered by trouble in the financial sector, whereas today’s economy is falling into recession due to an external shock. While we have not had an accident in the financial system so far, the risk of a financial crisis still seems significant today, with the world economy as leveraged as it was on the eve of the last financial crisis (around three times GDP). It’s true that the banking sector is better capitalised today, but we expect stress to come in non-bank financials – especially funds, ETFs, hedge funds, pension funds and insurance companies. Historically, the financial sector had to stabilise before equity markets could rise again sustainably.

6. Economic data should be expanding, or at least contracting less

Status: negative
Previous troughs in equity markets have occurred when cyclical economic data and inflation rates started to turn up again. This is clearly not happening yet. Economic data have only just started to collapse, and the ensuing decline in energy prices could move inflation rates lower. The economy doesn’t need to be in expansion mode before the equity outlook turns positive, but the pace of contraction needs to slow.

7. Pessimism around earnings needs to peak

Status: negative
Before equities turn around, the outlook for earnings growth likely needs to be near a low point. We’re not saying earnings growth needs to be positive or even improving for the time to be right. In fact, the rebound in earnings has previously lagged the rebound in equities at the end of a bear market. However, the pace of downward revisions in earnings estimates should have passed the point of maximum “bearishness” and be slowing. We aren’t there yet, but we are getting closer.

8. Investor sentiment must reach a low point

Status: negative
Equity bear markets typically come to an end when investors “throw in the towel” – meaning we see evidence of massive outflows from equity funds, investors overlooking good economic news, and low trading volumes as long-only investors leave the market. These are hard criteria to measure, but it seems that investor sentiment is not yet at its lowest point. For example, outflows from funds are substantial but not as extreme as they were in 2008-2009; there isn’t enough good virus-related news to overlook; and trading volumes are quite high. Moreover, the equity market downturn since February was exacerbated by the recent oil price shock. While, as of the day of writing, there are first signs of an agreement between Saudi Arabia and Russia on oil production cuts, the final outcome of the negotiations and implementation is still unclear.

Investors should be cautious, but the market bottom may not be far away

We don’t deem the moderate decline in market volatility since mid-March – as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) – as a sign to turn positive on equities just yet. In fact, in the past, equity volatility tended to top out a couple of months before equities actually troughed.

In summary, our watch list is still sending signals to be cautious about this bear market, but just as this has been an enormously quick sell-off by historical standards, the outlook could suddenly turn more positive. Moreover, this brutal sell-off has certainly created potential investment opportunities for active investors using a thorough bottom-up process, be it in equities or bonds.

What-signs-of-a-rebound-en-chart

 

> download

 

The time is right to use China A-shares to optimize equity allocations

21/04/2020
The-time-is-right-to-use-China-Ashares

Summary

The opening of the China A-share market to foreign investors—and the subsequent growing inclusion of a much larger number of Chinese companies in widely used equity indices—is poised to be, in our view, one of the most transformative events in the financial markets over the next decade. The implications for investors are numerous, complex and, above all, inevitable, making the maintenance of the status quo, in our view, an unviable solution.

Key takeaways

  • The opening of the China A-share market could be a transformative event, giving investors a unique opportunity to optimize global equity portfolios.
  • Stock Connect programs have lowered the cost of accessing domestic Chinese stocks and, as MCSI adds China A-shares into emerging-market indices, China’s growing importance will increasingly be reflected in global equity indices.
  • China A-shares add meaningful portfolio diversification, given their low historic correlation with major equity markets globally, and can help investors access a broader investment universe reflecting the faster-growing sectors of China’s “new economy.”
  • China’s importance is not reflected in the MSCI EM Index, which has a China A-share weighting of just 4.1%* and a mega/large-cap bias. “Buying the index” is not ideal for investors to gain appropriate exposure to China.
  • The asset class has risks relative to developed markets, but we expect such risks to normalize as the market matures.
  • On balance, we believe investors should consider a dedicated allocation to China A-shares. Our analysis suggests that a 10% to 30% direct allocation, coming from existing emerging-market portfolios, could improve returns and may diminish risk.

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors
  • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”)

    • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”) as an umbrella fund under the UCITS regulations has within it different sub-funds investing in fixed income securities, equities, and derivative instruments, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • All sub-funds (“Sub-Funds”) may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV. 

    • Some Sub-Funds as part of their investments may invest in any one or a combination of the instruments such as fixed income securities, emerging market securities, and/or mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, property-backed securities (especially REITs) and/or structured products and/or FDI, exposing to various potential risks (including leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market, fluctuations in the value of and the rental income received in respect of the underlying property, and over the counter transaction risks). 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in single countries or industry sectors (in particular small/mid cap companies) which may reduce risk diversification. Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, country and region, emerging market (such as Mainland China), creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, asset allocation, interest rate, volatility and liquidity, counterparty, sovereign debt, valuation, credit rating agency, company-specific, currency  (in particular RMB), RMB debt securities and Mainland China tax risks. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in convertible bonds, high-yield, non-investment grade investments and unrated securities that may subject to higher risks (include volatility, loss of principal and interest, creditworthiness and downgrading, default, interest rate, general market and liquidity risks) and therefore may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Funds. Convertibles will be exposed prepayment risk, equity movement and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest a significant portion of the assets in interest-bearing securities issued or guaranteed by a non-investment grade sovereign issuer (e.g. Philippines) and is subject to higher risks of liquidity, credit, concentration and default of the sovereign issuer as well as greater volatility and higher risk profile that may result in significant losses to the investors. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in European countries. The economic and financial difficulties in Europe may get worse and adversely affect the Sub-Funds (such as increased volatility, liquidity and currency risks associated with investments in Europe).

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in the China A-Shares market, China B-Shares market and/or debt securities directly  via the Stock Connect or the China Interbank Bond Market or Bond Connect and or other foreign access regimes and/or other permitted means and/or indirectly through all eligible instruments the qualified foreign institutional investor program regime and thus is subject to the associated risks (including quota limitations, change in rule and regulations, repatriation of the Fund’s monies, trade restrictions, clearing and settlement, China market volatility and uncertainty, China market volatility and uncertainty, potential clearing and/or settlement difficulties and, change in economic, social and political policy in the PRC and taxation Mainland China tax risks).  Investing in RMB share classes is also exposed to RMB currency risks and adverse impact on the share classes due to currency depreciation.

    • Some Sub-Funds may adopt the following strategies, Sustainable and Responsible Investment Strategy, SDG-Aligned Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Relative), Green Bond Strategy, Multi Asset Sustainable Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute Threshold), Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Score Strategy, and Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute). The Sub-Funds may be exposed to sustainable investment risks relating to the strategies (such as foregoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, selling securities when it might be disadvantageous to do so, and/or relying on information and data from third party ESG research data providers and internal analyses which may be subjective, incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable and/or reducing risk diversifications compared to broadly based funds) which may result in the Sub-Fund being more volatile and have adverse impact on the performance of the Sub-Fund and consequently adversely affect an investor’s investment in the Sub-Fund. Also, some Sub-Funds may be particularly focusing on the GHG efficiency of the investee companies rather than their financial performance which may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in share class with fixed distribution percentage (Class AMf). Investors should note that fixed distribution percentage is not guaranteed. The share class is not an alternative to fixed interest paying investment. The percentage of distributions paid by these share classes is unrelated to expected or past income or returns of these share classes or the Sub-Funds. Distribution will continue even the Sub-Fund has negative returns and may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Fund.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s capital or effectively out of the Sub-Fund’s capital which represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per share and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the respective Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi/AQ Dis (Annually/Monthly/Quarterly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     


    Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust constituted under the laws of Hong Kong pursuant to the Trust Deed. Allianz Thematic Income and Allianz Selection Income and Growth and Allianz Yield Plus Fund are the sub-funds of the Trust (each a “Sub-Fund”) investing in fixed income securities, equities and derivative instrument, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, company-specific, emerging market, creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, volatility and liquidity, valuation, sovereign debt, thematic concentration, thematic-based investment strategy, counterparty, interest rate changes, country and region, asset allocation risks and currency (such as exchange controls, in particular RMB), and the adverse impact on RMB share classes due to currency depreciation.  

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in other underlying collective schemes and exchange traded funds. Investing in exchange traded funds may expose to additional risks such as passive investment, tracking error, underlying index, trading and termination. While investing in other underlying collective schemes (“CIS”) may subject to the risks associated to such CIS. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in high-yield (non-investment grade and unrated) investments and/or convertible bonds which may subject to higher risks, such as volatility, creditworthiness, default, interest rate changes, general market and liquidity risks and therefore may  adversely impact the net asset value of the Fund. Convertibles may also expose to risks such as prepayment, equity movement, and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • All Sub-Funds may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks.  The use of derivatives may result in losses to the Sub-Funds which are greater than the amount originally invested. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • These investments may involve risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this website.

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s income and/or capital which in the latter case represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per distribution unit and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi Dis (Annually/Monthly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.