Five ways the coronavirus could change how we think about sustainability

07/05/2020
Five ways the coronavirus could change how we think about sustainability

Summary

The coronavirus pandemic has highlighted core sustainability issues such as income inequality, poor healthcare and complex supply chains. As a result, sustainability is likely to become increasingly integral to asset managers’ investment processes and risk analysis. Here are five ways we think the crisis will affect investors.

Key takeaways

  • Increased public demand for adequate healthcare is likely to overcome concerns about high costs, leading to widespread changes to healthcare models
  • Disruption to global trade may lead to greater focus on local communities and shorter, more controllable supply chains
  • Companies that take proactive steps to support their customers and employees during the pandemic should benefit when the crisis fades
  • Any backsliding on the progress already seen on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues – particularly the environment and climate change – will be short-lived

The coronavirus pandemic has rallied a remarkable response from governments, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), businesses, healthcare professionals and citizens. Arguably, this period of crisis has also exposed vulnerabilities in our economies and the systems on which we all rely. Looking ahead, we think investors will increasingly use sustainability as a lens to highlight major global risks and test the resilience of businesses and systems. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors will become even more important to assess the ability of both corporations and governments to weather a crisis of this scale. Our sustainability team has identified five ways in which this crisis may change the priorities for businesses – and investors.

People may seek out greater financial security and better access to healthcare

The coronavirus crisis has shown people just how quickly their lives can be turned upside-down, and how powerless they can be in the face of these challenges. Many citizens are experiencing a sudden loss of ability to earn an income, which may lead to a greater emphasis on insurance, investments and rainy-day savings. The outbreak has also demonstrated the fragility of life, which could lead people to focus more on healthy living and the importance of a good healthcare system.

Until now, some pressing healthcare issues have gone unaddressed because of concerns about high costs. But in the aftermath of this crisis, societies will likely demand that their governments sustain a suitable healthcare model. Governments will, in turn, ask their societies for support, both financially and through changes in behaviour, such as healthier food choices, a greater focus on hygiene and increased exercise. Regardless of how these behavioural changes manifest themselves, we think healthcare systems will become increasingly important in daily life, and we expect people will demand better access to high-quality care.

Supply chains could shorten; remote working could become the norm

Many international companies were already rethinking the geographic footprint of their production processes and adopting more local supply chains, partly due to geopolitical tensions. The coronavirus outbreak is likely to accelerate this process, fuelling the trend towards simpler supply chains that are easier for firms to control. As companies grow more “local”, they may also place a stronger emphasis on community relations, which should encourage more responsible behaviour and sustainable practices that will enhance brand value and customer loyalty.

Furthermore, companies will want to show how they will cope with similar events in the future. They may seek to formalise the infrastructure needed for employees to work and collaborate from home and serve clients without meeting face-to-face. The recognition that much commercial activity, socialising and learning can be carried out remotely should help those businesses that support these activities; tourism may also be affected. While there’s likely to be demand for improved “virtual” collaboration tools, companies will want to double down on cybersecurity and data security as even more of our lives move online.

Human capital management, labour relations and client centricity are likely to come to the fore

Organisations are likely to be judged by the way they treat employees during the crisis, particularly businesses that have taken advantage of government financial support. Issues related to job security and terms of employment (eg, pay, protections and benefits including healthcare) will come under scrutiny, and it will be relatively easy to compare the approaches of different companies. Those that fail to meet the mark could suffer long-lasting reputational damage, deterring customers and investors. Furthermore, they could struggle with employee motivation and commitment.

While consumer behaviour may not be fundamentally changed by the crisis, companies that are taking proactive steps to support their customers and maintain relationships could be the most resilient post-crisis. The long-term trend of consumers supporting local businesses, higher-quality localised brands, local sourcing and production closer to home is likely to accelerate as people realise that a reduced and more focused spending approach is viable.

Corporate governance will come under extensive scrutiny

We expect to see a greater focus on how companies allocate capital. This will have implications for the use of excess capital mechanisms (eg, share buybacks and dividends) as well as how management performance is measured, assessed and remunerated. Investors will likely want to consider companies’ approaches on a case-by-case basis, while recognising that any suspension or reduction in dividend payments (for example) would also hurt pension savers, policy holders and other retail investors.

Director responsibilities are likely to undergo scrutiny, including how the interests of employees, suppliers, customers and other important stakeholders were considered in the company’s response to the crisis. We expect to see a sharper focus on the role of business in society, and an emphasis on prioritising all of a company’s stakeholders – not just shareholders. On a more day-to-day level, companies will likely review key performance indicators and other incentive targets to ensure that executive rewards reflect stakeholder experience.

Any backsliding on environmental issues will be short-lived

Environmental and climate issues may initially take a back seat as countries prioritise economic recovery in the immediate aftermath of the crisis. However, these topics – which have dominated investors’ agenda in recent years – are likely to return to the top of the agenda before long. The environmental benefits of the slowdown in economic activity – such as cleaner air, cleaner water and less traffic – will be calculated, quantified and publicised. We expect this data will provide incentives for governments and businesses to develop strategies to reduce the environmental impact of economic activity.

The crisis and the subsequent spike in government debt will likely delay the European Union’s Green Deal as countries prioritise economic recovery, particularly those with historically high debt levels going into the crisis. However, there is a strong probability that the coronavirus outbreak could usher in a wave of green investments, as many countries have already made zero-carbon pledges and will likely make post-crisis investments in infrastructure and public services with green factors in mind. For example, there is a growing consensus in the US around a multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure stimulus plan that would likely include environmentally friendly provisions such as improving the supply and efficiency of the water system and building up the renewable energy infrastructure.

The global response to the coronavirus shows that governments can respond resolutely and forcefully when facing an existential threat. Citizens will likely demand the same concerted effort to address climate change.

> download

Two ways credit can add relative value as the cycle turns

10/08/2020
Two ways credit can add relative value as the cycle turns

Summary

The risk/reward profile of corporate bonds is less attractive now than when the coronavirus crisis began. Since then, bonds from higher-rated firms have been buoyed by central bank support. As the credit cycle turns, we suggest prioritising both issuer and security selection to seek outperformance – potentially with fallen angels and secured bonds.

Key takeaways

  • The risk/reward balance in corporate credit remains attractive, but less so than in March and April
  • Multi-sector and high-yield strategies focused on relatively undervalued assets have the potential to outperform, whether the credit rally continues or turns out to be fragile
  • Healthy and improving debt dynamics are critically important for issuer selection
  • As we move into a new stage of the credit cycle, security selection will be key to adding relative value to credit portfolios

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors
  • Allianz Global Investors Choice Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Choice Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust established under HK laws pursuant to the Trust Deed with different sub-Funds, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Investing in any of the sub-funds may be subject to various risks (including, but not limited to, risk investing in fixed-interest securities, equity risk, company-specific risk, country and region risk, inflation risk, downgrading risk and concentration risk).

    • Subscribing for units in some sub-funds are not the same as placing monies on deposit with a bank or deposit-taking company.

    • Some sub-funds are funds of funds and their assets are substantially invested in other sub-funds of the Trust. This may be subject to higher risks, such as concentration risk, risks relating to the nature of a fund of funds and asset allocation risk.
    • Some sub-funds may invest in a single country or region. The investment focus of such sub-funds may give rise to increased risk over more diversified sub-funds. 

    • Some sub-funds invest in China market and Renminbi may be subject to higher risks such as Chinese RMB currency risk, limited pool of investments risk, liquidity risk, credit risk and taxation risk. 

    • Some sub-funds may invest in financial futures or options contracts which may expose to higher counterparty, liquidity, and market risks.  Use of such derivatives may become ineffective and result in significant losses to the sub-funds. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.